No Matter What We Do...

We are electing another white guy as our next President. Let's face facts, Barack Obama is not a black male, and Hillary is not a white female. Both are white males! Just like their Republican contenders. You don't believe me? Here, I'll prove it:

Hillary clearly wore the pants when Bill was President. He might have been elected, but she was erected as she apparently dick-tated the policies he supposedly espoused. Plus, he gets back in the White House and he will govern just like he did the first time: from the bedroom. Hence, Hillary is just another white guy.

Mr. Obama can only call himself as black as I can call myself Chinese. The fact is, he is an extremely dark skinned white guy with a black father, a white mother, a patrician family, and a "white-guy" education. So he has a black wife, lots of white guys do... they are called WAR PRIZES or "proof that I am liberated beyond skin color". And my Chinese is only skin deep. I was raised American, live a very caucasian life, and other than a few minor bits about outward appearance that I espouse, I really have no business calling myself Chinese. The fact is that I might be more Hispanic than I am Chinese because I was raised in the Southwest; and because he was raised in Hawaii, he is likely more asian than he is black. But at the end of the day, he is still a white guy!

So, my point is made. No matter who we elect, this is not a ground breaking election. At the end of the day in November, we are just electing another white guy.

Hunting Season

It's official. It doesn't matter which party you belong to because the target is always the same. Hillary, does it feel like you were born with cross-hairs for a birthmark? Or are you just starting to get both barrels from all members of both major parties because of your stances or lack thereof?

On the other hand, if you are looking for change, and don't mind a little help from another planet, never hesitate to ask Dennis where he gets his ideas from.

Running Against the Past

I am not the only person to notice this, but it seems that both major parties have found parity in campaigning against the past. The Democrats are running against Bush while the Republicans are running against Clinton (past and future). Well, some Republicans are running against Bush while some Dems are running against Clinton.

What I am wondering is, when are the major candidates going to stop fighting a past they cannot change, and start fighting a political war based on the future of this country? And for those who do want to fight for a future, when are they going to start going beyond platitudes and put real substance into their fights?

This weeks featured candidates who do just that:
Mike Huckabee
Dennis Kucinich